• Refugee Rights Reports

    The Resilience and Contributions of Recent Refugees

    In an ever-changing world fraught with turmoil and conflict, the plight of refugees remains one of the most pressing humanitarian crises of our time. As borders blur and societies evolve, the stories of those fleeing persecution, violence, and hardship are poignant reminders of human resilience and the universal quest for safety and dignity.

    Recent years have seen a significant surge in the number of refugees worldwide, driven by conflicts, political unrest, economic instability, and the devastating impact of climate change.

    According to the United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), by the end of 2023, the global refugee population had surpassed 26 million, with millions more internally displaced within their own countries.

    While these statistics may seem daunting, behind each number lies a unique narrative of struggle, survival, and ultimately, resilience. The experiences of recent refugees are as diverse as the circumstances that forced them to flee. From the war-torn regions of Syria and Afghanistan to the political upheaval in Venezuela and Myanmar, each displacement represents a rupture in the lives of millions, often leaving families torn apart and communities shattered.

    However, amidst the adversity, there are stories of courage and hope that illuminate the human spirit. Recent refugees, despite the immense challenges they face, exhibit remarkable resilience and determination to rebuild their lives and contribute to their new communities.

    What is peculiar about recent refugees?

    One of the most striking aspects of the refugee experience is the ingenuity and resourcefulness displayed by individuals and families forced to leave behind everything familiar. From setting up makeshift schools in refugee camps to launching small businesses to sustain themselves, refugees demonstrate a remarkable capacity to adapt and thrive in the face of adversity.

    Moreover, recent refugees bring with them a wealth of knowledge, skills, and talents that enrich the fabric of their host societies. Whether doctors, engineers, artists, or entrepreneurs, many refugees possess valuable expertise that can contribute to the social, cultural, and economic vitality of their new communities.

    By embracing diversity and harnessing the potential of refugees, societies stand to benefit from the myriad contributions they bring.

    It is also essential to recognize the resilience of host communities that welcome refugees with open arms, often in the face of their challenges. Despite limited resources and sometimes entrenched prejudices, many communities around the world have extended compassion and solidarity to those seeking refuge, embodying the best of humanity in the midst of adversity.

    What needs to be done?

    However, while progress has been made in providing assistance and protection to refugees, significant challenges persist. Adequate funding for humanitarian aid, ensuring access to education and healthcare, and fostering inclusive policies that promote integration and social cohesion are among the many pressing issues that require concerted global action.

    As we reflect on the experiences of recent refugees, let us reaffirm our commitment to upholding the principles of compassion, solidarity, and human rights for all. By standing in solidarity with refugees and recognizing their resilience and contributions, we not only honor their dignity but also reaffirm our shared humanity in an increasingly interconnected world.

    In the face of adversity, recent refugees embody the unwavering spirit of resilience, reminding us of the power of hope and the resilience of the human spirit. As they navigate the challenges of displacement and rebuild their lives in new lands, their stories serve as a testament to the enduring strength of the human spirit and the universal quest for freedom, dignity, and a better tomorrow.

    Do you want to read more refugee stories? Go here.

  • Refugee Rights Reports

    Understanding Refugees in Gaza: Their Struggles and Hopes

    In Gaza, there are many people who are called refugees. But what does it mean to be a refugee? Let’s find out.

    A refugee is someone who had to leave their home because it wasn’t safe anymore. Maybe there was a war or some other danger. They leave everything behind to find safety in a new place.

    In Gaza, many people are refugees because of conflicts and troubles in their land. They had to leave their homes and now live in refugee camps. These camps are not like regular neighborhoods. They are crowded and life can be hard there.

    Life in a refugee camp is not easy. Families often live in small spaces, sometimes without proper electricity or clean water. Kids might not have enough schools to go to, and parents struggle to find work.

    But despite all these challenges, refugees in Gaza have hopes and dreams. They want a better life for themselves and their children. They hope for peace and a chance to rebuild their homes and communities.

    Many organizations and countries try to help refugees in Gaza. They provide food, shelter, and support to make life a little easier. But more help is needed to give refugees a chance to thrive and rebuild their lives.

    Understanding the struggles and hopes of refugees in Gaza is important. It reminds us to be kind and compassionate, and to work together to create a world where everyone can live in safety and dignity.

    Discover more articles delving into the experiences and journeys of refugees. Click the link below to explore further and immerse yourself in their stories.

    What if you were the one? Now is the time to assist. Follow NRP on how to help.

  • Refugee Rights Reports

    Ukrainian Refugees Find Shelter and Solidarity in Poland

    As the conflict in Ukraine intensifies, the exodus of civilians seeking safety has surged, with neighboring Poland emerging as a primary destination for those fleeing the violence. The influx of Ukrainian refugees into Poland has sparked a remarkable display of solidarity and compassion, as communities and organizations come together to provide aid and support to those in need.

    Since the outbreak of the conflict on 24 February 2022, thousands of Ukrainians have crossed the border into Poland. They’re seeking refuge from the devastation gripping their homeland. Among them are women, mostly children, older individuals, and individuals with disabilities, all seeking safety and shelter from the horrors of war.

    What has Poland done to Ukrainian refugees?

    Poland, has recognized its role as a neighboring nation and a member of the European Union. As such, it has swiftly mobilized to assist the influx of refugees.

    For example, temporary shelters have been established along the border to accommodate the arrivals, providing them with essential necessities such as food, shelter, and medical assistance.

    Moreover, Polish authorities have streamlined the asylum process, ensuring that refugees receive the necessary documentation and support to rebuild their lives in safety.

    In addition, the response from Polish citizens has been equally remarkable.

    Across the country, communities have opened their doors to Ukrainian refugees. They offered them lodging, meals, and emotional support. Equally, churches, charities, and volunteer groups have organized donation drives. They collect essential supplies and funds to aid the refugees in their time of need.

    The outpouring of generosity and solidarity underscores the deep bonds of humanity that transcend borders and differences.

    Recommendation

    Despite the challenges posed by the influx of refugees, Poland remains steadfast in its commitment to providing assistance and support to those fleeing the conflict in Ukraine. The Polish government continues to work closely with international organizations. In the same way, they collaborate with neighboring countries to coordinate humanitarian efforts. This is to ensure the well-being of all refugees. Every country is called upon to shower support in any way possible.

    However, the journey ahead remains daunting for many Ukrainian refugees. As the conflict persists, the need for sustained humanitarian assistance and international solidarity remains crucial. As the world watches the unfolding crisis in Ukraine, let us not forget the human faces behind the headlines. These individuals and families who have been uprooted from their homes and livelihoods, seeking nothing more than safety and peace.

    In Poland, the spirit of compassion and solidarity shines brightly, offering hope and solace to those who have been displaced by war. As Ukrainian refugees find shelter and support within its borders, Poland stands as a beacon of humanity in the face of adversity. Beyond everything, it reminds us all the power of kindness and empathy in times of crisis.

    Just like the Polish couple in a UNHCR feature story who helped Ukrainian refugees to help themselves, everyone could lend a helping hand.

    Explore further articles on the experiences and journeys of refugees by clicking the link below. Delve deeper into their stories.

  • Refugee Rights Reports

    Egypt’s response to Gaza refugees migration

    According to Egypt, Israel is forcing civilians to flee and come to their country as Gaza refugees. In response to the humanitarian concerns, Egypt is willing to give aid and allow their country as an aid corridor. However, Egypt rejects any move to set up safe corridors for refugees fleeing the enclave. The Egyptian security seem to be battling with a lot of instability around the border.

    Since the UN partition of the region, Gaza, a coastal strip of land wedged between Israel in the north and east and Egypt to the southwest. It houses about 2.3 million people who have been living under a blockade since Palestinian armed group Hamas took control.

    Over the years, Egypt has long restricted the flow of Gaza Palestinians, sadly even during the toughest conflicts.

    What is the response of the US to Gaza refugees?

    Speaking for the US National Security, Advisor Jake Sullivan remarked the US has been holding consultations with Isreal and Egypt. This is in relation to Egypt allowing a safe passage for civillians from Gaza. Mainly because of the devastating Isreali reaction to a deadly incursion by Hamas fighters into Isreal.

    In addition, the US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said, the consultations were continuing.Based on reports from Reuters news agency, Egypt is uncomfortable with providing safe corridors for civilians to protect “the right of Palestinians to hold on to their cause and their land”.

    What is the right to return?

    In a bit to assist Palestinian refugees, many Arab states still have camps. They are open for descendants of those who fled. Others have left their homes during the war surrounding Israel’s 1948 creation.

    For the wider middle east states, a final peace deal must include the right of those Gaza refugees to return to Palenstine  This is a move Israel isn’t willing to approve.

    How is the United Nations reacting to assist Gaza refugees?

    The UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres promised fundamental  supplies, including fuel, food and water, should be allowed into Gaza.

    “We need rapid and unimpeded humanitarian access now,” he told reporters, thanking Egypt “for its constructive engagement to facilitate humanitarian access through the Rafah crossing and to make the El Arish airport available for critical assistance”, according to Aljazeera.

    UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric later added: “Civilians need to be protected. We do not want to see a mass exodus of Gaza…”

    In another discussion between the Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and the Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani,  Egypt has been intensifying its efforts to contain the situation in Gaza. 

    Based on the Egyptian security sources, talks between Egypt and the US, Qatar and Turkey are centered on delivering humanitarian aid through the Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula under a geographically limited ceasefire.

    To show humanitarian support, Turkey’s president said work had started to deliver aid, without elaborating.

    Sadly, Gaza and Eyptian reports add that the Rafah crossing, which is the main exit point from Gaza not controlled by Israel, has been closed since October. This is because, there were Israeli bombardments on the Palestinian side.

    With repeated comments, Egypt warns against the possibility that Israel’s assault on Gaza could lead to the displacement of residents from the enclave onto Egyptian territory.

    In response, Israel’s ambassador in Egypt, Amira Oron, said on social media that Israel had “no intentions in relation to Sinai, and has not asked Palestinians to move there … Sinai is Egyptian territory.

    Recommendation

    Now more than ever is the time for the world to offer assistance to both sides in this conflict. Mere promises of humanitarian help and political dialogues with interest should not be entertained.

    War has never been a solution to disagreements, and it will never be. Many people are now named Gaza refugees

    Go here to read more stories about refugees around the world.

  • Refugee Rights Reports

    International Day of Education

    Introduction: UNESCO’s Establishment of the International Day of Education highlights the pivotal role of education in fostering peace and development.

    Education is recognized as a human right, paralleling the significance of other fundamental rights. Its correlation with maintaining peace and societal progress cannot be understated.

    How can you define the international day of education?

    The definition of education, often linked to structured instruction within schools and universities, has prompted extensive debate.

    However, it’s essential to acknowledge that education extends beyond formal institutions and can encompass home training.

    The international day of education responsibility

    : Addressing the responsibility of education provision raises questions about who should be responsible.

    Education is both a public obligation and a parental duty.

    While some attribute the sole responsibility to governments, instances where parents hinder their children’s education challenge this notion.

    Global Challenges

    Current data from UNESCO indicates that millions of children and youths are still devoid of education, emphasizing the global challenge at hand.

    Exploring how governments can collaborate to diminish these numbers becomes crucial, along with discussing the balance between government and familial responsibility.

    Education’s Evolution

    Education is an evolving entity, influenced by time, politics, and technological advancements.

    Analyzing recent changes and their impact, especially in the context of global events, showcases education’s adaptability and its role in preparing individuals for an ever-changing world.

    Quotes on Education

    Well-known quotes about education, such as Aristotle’s “The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet”.

    Einstein’s “Education is what remains after one has forgotten what one has learned in school,” prompt introspection on the multifaceted nature of education and its lasting impact.

    Conclusion

    The celebration of the International Day of Education by UNESCO emphasizes education’s vital role in shaping societies and promoting peace. Understanding the multifaceted responsibilities of education – shared between governments and families – and acknowledging its evolving nature is essential in ensuring a better future for all.

    Explore articles that delve into the realm of education, covering various aspects such as its importance, challenges, evolution, and impact on society and individuals.

    Discover how education shapes our world and plays a critical role in personal growth, societal progress, and global development.

  • Refugee Rights Reports

    Colombia Initiates Opening of Migrant Processing Centers

    In a move to address irregular border crossings, Colombian officials have declared the establishment of three “safe mobility” centers. These sites are intended to facilitate the processing of migrants and asylum seekers from Haiti, Venezuela, and Cuba who are en route to the United States. These migrant processing centers are a part of a broader regional endeavor to manage and regulate border movements.

    Outlined by the Colombian Foreign Ministry on Thursday, this endeavor marks the commencement of a six-month “exploratory phase.” Two of these miigrant processing centers will be situated in Soacha and Cali. Notably, the third center, located in Medellín, has already commenced operations since August 1st. The objective behind these sites is to provide a structured and secure environment for migrants and asylum seekers. Thuus, offering a streamlined process. Also, ensuring their safety while on the move.

    What is the Colombian government’s take on this initiative?

    “This initiative reflects the dedication of both nations to establish an environment conducive to secure, organized, compassionate, and lawful migration, while also reinforcing global protection and cooperation frameworks,” stated the press release from the ministry, Al-Jazeera reported.

    These immigration migrant processing centers form a component of the broader strategy. It is led by the administration of US President Joe Biden. It’s aim is to reduce the volume of individuals seeking refuge through irregular means at the US-Mexico border.

    What is the statistics on border crossings?

    In 2022, irregular border crossings at the US-Mexico border reached an unprecedented peak.

    As the contentious Title 42 border expulsion policy approaches its expiration date, Republican officials expressed concerns that arrivals could surge dramatically,. This could potentially straining border resources to their limits.

    To address these challenges, “safe mobility” sites, similar to the initiative introduced by Colombia, were suggested as potential solutions.

    These migrant processing centers were positioned as an alternative for migrants and asylum seekers. That is those who might otherwise embark on the arduous and risky journey northward to the US-Mexico border to seek refuge.

    This approach aimed to provide a safer and more organized avenue. All individuals seeking protection will get assistance. Thus, mitigating the strain on border infrastructure.

    What is the US objective concerning migrant processing centers?

    The objective, as articulated by the Biden administration, is to dissuade those with intentions of embarking on irregular migration journeys to the United States or other destinations. This includes those planning to go to Canada, from undertaking such perilous risks.

    In addition to Colombia, other nations are also in the process of establishing migration processing sites.

    An illustrative example is the collaboration between the US and Guatemala, where migration processing centers were unveiled in June.

    Furthermore, an alliance involving the US, Panama, and Colombia began in April. The idea is to collectively address irregular migration through the treacherous Darien Gap—a well-trodden path that migrants and asylum seekers take when journeying from South to Central America.

    This gap, characterized by its hazardous terrain and vulnerability to flooding, poses grave dangers to those attempting to traverse it. Criminal groups have exploited these conditions, posing additional threats to migrants along the route.

    What are the effects?

    Following the conclusion of the Title 42 border expulsion policy, there was a notable reduction in irregular border crossings from Mexico into the United States. The numbers decreased from 206,702 in May to 144,571 in June.

    The Biden administration highlighted these figures as indicative of the desired impact of its immigration policies. However, recent reports revealed a noteworthy development. Border apprehensions surged by over 30 percent in July, underscoring a rebound in activity. Despite this increase, the apprehension rates remain below the levels observed before the expiration of Title 42.

    My take on migrant processing centers

    While the United States has shown generosity in welcoming migrants, I believe that this initiative stands out as one of the most effective approaches. It not only addresses the issue of irregular migration but also serves to mitigate, if not entirely prevent, tragic scenarios where migrants and asylum seekers lose their lives on perilous journeys. The toll of countless lives lost during such ventures is a somber reality.

    By encouraging migrants to seek asylum in the first country of entry, this initiative not only aligns with international migration law but also prioritizes safety and human lives. It offers a solution that goes beyond curbing illegal migration by promoting a more humane and organized approach to seeking refuge. In doing so, it holds the potential to significantly reduce the occurrence of dangerous and often deadly journeys that many individuals undertake in search of a better life.

    In essence, this approach addresses both the practical and ethical dimensions of migration management. By providing a structured pathway for asylum seekers, it not only upholds legal principles but also honors the value of human lives. This initiative marks a significant step forward in fostering a more compassionate and responsible approach to migration, reflecting a commitment to protecting vulnerable individuals while ensuring orderly processes.

    Click this link to read more stories about migrants and refugees.

  • Refugee Rights Reports

    The reason why UK is sending asylum seekers to Rwanda

                                                                                                                                                   

    Recently, the UK captured global attention by unveiling a novel initiative to relocate asylum seekers to Rwanda.

    This move has sparked widespread apprehension, particularly among rights organizations that are scrutinizing the government’s motives. Despite these pressing inquiries, the government persists in its plan to transfer certain asylum seekers to Rwanda.

    Nonetheless, this strategy has faced allegations of unlawfulness, a verdict reinforced by the Court of Appeal.

    Numerous human rights advocates contend that this ruling might find itself challenged at the Supreme Court, thus casting a cloud of speculation across the international landscape.

                                                                                                     

    What is the Rwanda asylum seekers plan?

    According to international law, people can seek asylum in any country they chose. For asylees in the UK, there has been a five-year trial related to their transfer.

    The decision which was announced in April 2022 stated that asylees will be sent to Rwanda on a one way ticket.

    The strangest thing about this new plan is that, these people will not get an automatic acceptance into Rwanda.

    They might be granted the refugee status. It is uncertain. Otherwise, they can settle there on other grounds. In other words, they can seek asylum in another  “safe third country”.

    Why is UK considering this plan?

    The answer to this question will not be acceptable to everyone. However, it is important. The UK government says this plan will deter people arriving in the UK through “illegal, dangerous or unnecessary methods”, such as on small boats which cross the English Channel, the BBC reported.

    Apparently, the decision for some people to risk their lives to come to UK is beyond comprehension. In 2022, more than 45,700 people used this route to come to the UK.  Those were the highest figure since records began.

    It is reported that, there are small-boat crossings almost every month since 2023. Though it has decreased compared to last year, the numbers are expected to rise in the coming months. 

    It is one year now since the first flight was scheduled for asylees to be sent to Rwanda. This   trip was cancelled mainly because of legal challenges. There is uncertainty as to when the next flight will be planned, but speculations are high as the UK government continues talks about the issue.

    What was the Court of Appeal’s decision about asylum seekers?

    Regarding the huge question about Rwanda’s safety in relation to this plan, the Court of Appeal overturned an earlier ruling by the High Court. This decision which came in June 2023 proclaimed the Rwanda plan was lawful.

    The judges opinioned that, Rwanda is not a safe third country. This is because there are some inconsistencies with its asylum system. One of which is that, asylum seekers could be sent back to their home countries, thus compelling them to be exposed to persecution again. 

    It said that “unless and until” those deficiencies are corrected, removal of asylum seekers to Rwanda is unlawful, BBC reported.

    From the regional perspective, this Rwanda policy breaches Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits torture and inhuman treatment.

    The final decision on this case was rather unclear. It was not a unanimous one. Among the three judges who precided, two agreed to reverse the High Court’s decision, but the third did not.

    The judges said their decision does not imply a view about the “political merits” of the policy.

    Who brought this case against the government?

    Asylum Aid is a British charity working to support asylum seekers in the UK. They brought this case claiming it violates the rights of asylees in the UK.

    Regarding the judgement, they said it was a “vindication of the importance of the rule of law and basic fairness when fundamental rights are at stake”.

    What is UNHCR’s position?

    The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees advised the court in the appeal as it related to international refugee law.

    They agreed with the ruling, and urged the UK government to “pursue other measures” instead.

    How did the UK government respond to the decision about asylum seekers?

    Representing the government, Home Secretary Suella Braverman called the judgement “disappointing”. On the other hand, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak confirmed the government will be sought permission to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. This means the legal proceedings might take a long time. 

    The pressure from other refugee charities seems to be making positive effects. Airlines such as Privilege Style and two others who had previously conducted deportation flights  withdrew from their Home Office contract regarding the Rwanda scheme.

    How many people might be sent to Rwanda’as asylum seekers?

    To indicate the number of people who might be possibly sent to Rwanda, the government had previously said anyone entering the UK illegally after 1 January 2022 could be sent. In this statement, there was no limit about the number. 

    On the side of Rwanda, it claims to be able to handle a 1,000 asylum seekers during the trial period. There could be space for more people they added.

    This plan will not benefit only the UK. It is said to be an exchange wherein, Rwanda can request the UK to take in some of its most vulnerable refugees.

    How much does the asylum seeker plan cost?

    Reports have it that the UK has paid the Rwandan government £140m. The overall cost is not clear to the public.

    An economic-impact assessment was done for the government’s Illegal Migration Bill.  It estimated that removing each individual to a third country, such as Rwanda, would cost £63,000 more than keeping them in the UK

    This huge figure is the difference between the total cost of removing an individual – estimated to be £169,000 – and the £106,000 spent on housing support if they remain in the UK.

    In unclear terms, the Home office claims this policy is aimed at deterring illegal individuals. The figures of the number remain undefined. 

    Generally, the UK’s asylum system costs £3bn a year.  This massive amount means almost £7m a day is spent on hotel accommodation for refugees and asylum seekers.

    Several critics claim the daily cost is so high because of the long time taken to decide on applications. Also, the strict ban on asylum seekers working while waiting for confirmation of their status is irrelevant. 

    Are you interested in reading more articles about refugees? Click here.

  • Refugee Rights Reports

    What Erdogan’s win means to Syrian Refugees in Turkey

    Turkey will forever be applauded for opening their border widely to millions of refugees especially those from Syria. For the long time that they have been there, anti-refugee sentiments have been common. Several times, they were threatened that they will be forcefully repatriated. 

    The recent May Turkish elections left everyone unsure of the future, especially Syrians. For many, voting was not just a performance of political responsibility but an outward display of the need to see change. Whether Syrian-Turkish citizens or Turkish, everyone had high hopes for the outcome of their votes. 

    Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s win for another five years is a source of victory and hope to many people.  Many people voted for him because they thought his government protected their families and gave them the opportunity to have adoptive homes. 

    What does this mean to Syrians?

    Many Syrians see hope in the government of Erdogan. For example, Al-Abdullah  from Palmyra told ALjazeera his story. He didn’t hesitate to because of hi family. Fortunately for him, he was naturalized three years ago, because of his achievements in sports and education. His engagement in martial arts as a champion and a student of engineering at the University of Gaziantep, gave him the rare possibility to be selected for the citizenship process.

    Regarding his family in Gaziantep, they were living under “temporary protection status”. In refugee terms, that implies they are legally protected from refoulement. Despite the fact that they entered Turkey illegally. For many years now, they have legal residency and access to basic services such as healthcare and education. However, their travel ability is limited only within their assigned province.

    Based on reports from the United Nations refugee agency, the vast majority of refugees in Turkey – 3.6 million – are Syrians. They are living under temporary protection. Amazingly, about 200,000 have been granted Turkish citizenship since the 2011 Syrian war broke out.

    What are the challenges Syrians face in Turkey?

    Many Syrians claim there have been huge changes in the way they are treated by Turks. They blame the deteriorated relationship and unpleasant sentiments towards them based in the increasing economic crisis that has brought high levels of inflation. This has been directly connected to the fall of Turkey’s currency. All these situations provoked some Turks to become unhappy with migrants as a whole. Harassments and racist attacks have been the order of the day for many Syrians by some radical Turks. 

    “At least [under Erdogan] I feel like I can be involved in Turkish politics like a Turk, not just as a Syrian. Many of us feel we are an integral part of this country because we grew up mainly here and don’t remember much about Syria,”  al-Abdullah told Aljazeera.

    What do Syrians think about the election results?

    On the streets of Inonu Caddesi, Gaziantep’s Syrian-majority neighbourhood, many Syrians say they feel relieved. Many of the half a million Syrians in Gaziantep were seriously affected by the devastating February 6 earthquakes. There were rumors that Erdogan will not have votes from this area because his government mismanaged funds and responded slowly when the disaster occurred. However, to everyone’s surprise,  Gaziantep had 62.7 percent of the votes for Erdogan. That huge number is said to be mostly from Syrians because this is a border city between Turkey and Syria. 

    Reporting to Aljazeera News, 37-year-old Kara Ali said, “For me and my family, [his victory] is more ‘comfortable’ because his opponent based his election campaign on racism towards us refugees, which is certainly unsettling.” 

    Syrians claim that their presence in Turkey was at the core of the second round of campaigns. This is because both presidential candidates spoke about the status of refugees in their countries. 

    What was the major fear of Syrians?

    It has been a shock for many people as the other political candidate Kemal Kilicdaroglu had been making and posting public posters of his racist motives. With the big inscription ‘Syrians Will Go’, he outrightly accused them of threatening national security.  Such xenophobic rhetoric began after severe earthquakes, then during the election campaigns. For many Syrians, it was almost their time to leave Turkey. They were more afraid and uncertain about their already uncertain future. 

    Adding to Aljazeera,  “I was living under great psychological pressure due to the increase in hate speech and the rise of racism against Syrians,”  Al-Dimashqi said in Sakulta, a popular coffee shop in Gaziantep where Syrians often meet.

    “All our conversations and meetings as Syrians centred around the elections. We talked about our unknown future after the elections and our fear of how society would treat us in the aftermath,” he added. Al-Dimashqi, originally from Damascus. He moved to Gaziantep in 2016 by illegally crossing the border.

    Every Syrian wanted Erdogan to win, mainly because they felt he accepted them as humans in Turkey. Though relieved, caution is the new watchword for Syrians these days.

    Another main reason why Syrians were satisfied with Edrogan’s win is because he had promised during the campaign trail, that one million Syrians would be “voluntarily returned” to their country. This is in connection to his plans on normalizing relations with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Though there is no timeframe for this, Syrians with temporary protections are concerned that they’ll have to face other challenges, such as new paperwork to remain legal, or increases in rents and bills.

    Generally, many Syrians still feel unsafe and insure in Turkey. 

    Recommendation

    Now is the time for the Turkish government to make clear stands on their support of refugees. Giving them a home is an undeniable assistance but guaranteeing their stay in peace is a greater responsibility. All these distressed, vulnerable people need a place to call home until there is stability in their own country. If Turkey can maintain that home for them, it will be a stable environment for many people, especially innocent children. 

    Are you interested in reading more stories about refugees around the world, go here?

  • Refugee Rights Reports

    How Malawi is dealing with refugees?

    For many years, Malawi, like many other countries, has been supporting numerous refugees running into their country fleeing several situations.

    Recently, there was an arrest and detention of 377 refugees, including 117 children. Last week, on the 17 May, there were reports of forced relocation to the Dzaleka refugee camp by the Malawi authorities.

    The government seems to consider camping as a solution to support refugees. 

    Nationwide reports surprised everyone as the government made arrests and closed some shops and businesses owned by refugees in Lilongwe.

    Even asylum seekers were affected by this unexpected encampment policy.

    This new order stipulates all refugees and asylum-seekers should voluntarily return to the camp. The decree mandates all the above-listed group of people living both in local communities and cities to go back latest by 15 April 2023.

    Reactions of Refugees in Malawi

    Among the many who fled back to the camp, 35 persons recounted their unhappy movement to the UNHCR. For example, some said they fled and abandoned everything. Others almost lost family members due to the chaos.

    For many, their initial stay in Maula Central Prison before being transferred in government vehicles to Dzaleka on 19 and 20 May was dreadful.

    UNHCR call to the Malawi government

    “We strongly reiterate our call to the authorities to rescind their relocation decision as the existing structures in Dzaleka refugee camp are already stretched to the limit and cannot accommodate more refugees in a dignified manner,” said Valentin Tapsoba, Director of UNHCR’s Regional Bureau for Southern Africa. “This will result in immense human suffering and create a new dependency on humanitarian assistance.”

    Any return to Dzaleka refugee camp should be in accordance with human rights principles and not result in the detention of children.

    How many people have returned?

    Based on registered records, 505 individuals have returned to the camp. Most of who forcefully moved.

    The situation in the camp is unstable. Some refugees have returned to their previous homes. Others are spending time with family relatives. Sadly, approximately 110 people are homeless. They are lodging at the camp’s reception center. This has created congestion, resulting in insufficient water and sanitation facilities. All this has led to high safety and health concerns.

    Effects of the relocation.

    Dzaleka refugee camp, like every other lodging facility, has the following problems; health services, water, shelter and sanitation facilities.

    The increasing population is a massive challenge to provide needed support. 

    One of the negative effects of relocating self-sufficient and productive refugees and asylum-seekers to Dzaleka will only exacerbate these problems.

    This is directly dwindling on their prospects of rebuilding their lives and creating a sense of financial stability for their children.

    The relocation will also negatively affect refugee children enrolled in schools across the country. They have to join overcrowded classes in the camp, this is seriously impacting their education.

    Malawi is host to over 50,600 refugees. These people are  mainly from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Burundi and Rwanda. As of 22 May, the 12,000 refugee population designed for the camp has been exceeded beyond limit.

    An estimated, 8,000 refugees and asylum-seekers living in  in Malawi’s rural and urban areas. The timeframe is unknown.

    Several of them said they came in 2003 and others in 1994. These people have with no doubt fully integrated into the local Malawian community. 

    After all these years, it is no surprise that they have become self-reliant.

    This implies they contribute to the local economy via small-scale businesses. Some engaged in other entrepreneurial activities to support their lives far away from their war-torn countries.

    Malawi’s obligation under international law to protect refugees.

    Malawi’s obligation under international law to protect refugees.

    The Malawian government is a signatory to the UNHCR refugee convention.

    The unique country is part to the Comprehensive Refugee Response Framework.

    In addition, it has pledged at the Global Refugee Forum in December 2019 to incorporate refugee matters into its national development agenda. 

    They promised to reform the legal and policy framework.

    This includes a cover registration and documentation of refugees. Furthermore, they vowed to enhance refugee status determination and support the self-reliance of refugees through increased livelihood activities.

    Recommendation

    Refugees, like every other group of people, need support. As much the huge population can affect the financial support from their host governments, there is no denial to the other measure of support. 

    Although camping refugees was an old effect measure to control the supply of necessities, camping is now ineffective. The increasing population is affecting the supply of fundamental resources. Humanitarian organizations like the UNHCR are battling with heavy financial constraints to support jobless, idle refugees. 

    It is unreasonable for hardworking economic refugees to become jobless. On the one hand, it is worthwhile mentioning that, these people did not just assist their families with the proceeds of their businesses, but they provided needed support to Malawians too. 

    Destabilizing them economically and forcing them to return to the camps is not a mitigating solution. In other ways, they are sending them back to the time they fled the war. 

    Above everything, children, who form the highest majority of the refugee population, suffer the most. Many will no longer be able to continue school. Others have a mandate to join already small, cramped camp schools battling with major education problems.

    Supporting refugees is limited to giving them a piece of land to build camps. It should be enabling these people to be able to stand for themselves and fend for their families in all aspects.

    If you want to read more refugee articles, go here.

  • Refugee Rights Reports

    The conflict in Sudan is worsening migration rates

    As hostilities continue to flare in Sudan, international organizations are offering their utmost support to vulnerable people. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the UN Refugee Agency, and many other humanitarian organizations are warning that the conflict is having a devastating impact on the civilian population. This is indirectly increasing the number of refugees and internally displaced people across the country.

    Thus far, serious fighting and insecurity has driven tens of thousands to flee in search of safety within and outside their country.

    Work for rights organs like the UNHCR has been temporarily suspended. It is extremely dangerous for support organizations to offer lifesaving assistance to people in Khartoum, the Darfur’s and North Kordofan. 

    As expected, this suspension adds to the protective risk. Those dependent  on humanitarian assistance to survive are in dare situations.

    Though efforts to continue operations and help has been minimal, it is applaudable that some refugee community leaders and refugee committee members, can still be contacted. Support is still provided to some refugees via counselling.

    Refugee camps in Sudan

    Graciously, refugee camps in Gedaref, Kassala, White Nile and Blue Nile, as well as refugee settlements in South and West Kordofan are so far relatively calm with essential services running, including health and water. Based on UNHCR reports, around 33,000 refugees have fled Khartoum to find safety in the refugee camps in White Nile State. Also, almost 2,000 are in the camps in Gedaref. Additionally, 5,000 to Kassala since the crisis started unfolding a few weeks ago.

    What is the role of the World Food Program and other organizations in Sudan

    WFP has been providing food in-country in collaboration with other UN agencies, such as UNICEF. Locally, NGOs are willing to support as the extreme concerns for assistance grow. Sadly, until politicians make a firm decision to end this distasteful saga, innocent civilians, including women and children, will only continue to suffer.

    Major challenges in Sudan

    Access to and sharing of information with displaced communities. This seriously affects data collection in certain locations. 

    Lack of electricity

    Fuel shortages 

    Poor connectivity. This is sadly limiting everyone’s ability to communicate effectively.

    UNHCR reports that a number of sites hosting internally displaced people have been burned to the ground. At the same time, civilian houses and humanitarian premises are being hit by bullets.

    Which region is the most affected?

    Darfur leads the chain as one of the regions most affected by violence and high levels of criminality, even prior to the current situation.  It is no surprise that current hostilities may fuel pre-existing ethnic and intercommunal tensions over land and access to resources. That will indirectly trigger greater displacement and increase the need for humanitarian aid. This would have disastrous implications for a region and continent already facing large migration.

    Which countries have supported

    The UNHCR ha confirmed that in Chad, with the collaboration of the Government, they have verified 7,500 refugees. This is out of at least 20,000 who have crossed the border in the last week or so. To add, some 14,000 people have fled to South Sudan, mainly South Sudanese returning.  

    On the other hand, in Egypt, the Government has reported 16,000 crossings, of which 14,000 are Sudanese. UNHCR is working with the UN, the Government and partners like Sudanese community leaders and the Egyptian Red Crescent (ERC) to support people fleeing and in need of international protection. They have all made a coordinated plan to respond to the needs of those crossing.  Some of the Sudanese families who crossed have approached UNHCR in Cairo for registration.  

    At the other border with the Central African Republic and Ethiopia, the UNHCR has noted lower numbers of arrivals. They are uncertain to confirm the exact figures.

    Recommendations

    UNHCR calls on parties to the conflict to cease hostilities immediately to allow humanitarian assistance to reach those who need it most. Equally, fighting parties should allow people trying to flee the fighting to do so safely. All parties must protect civilians, including refugees and displaced people, as well as the safety of humanitarian staff and civilian infrastructure as emphasized in all international peace conventions. 

    The geometric speed of people moving out of the country makes it challenging for the UNHCR and other rights bodies to know the precise numbers of new refugee arrivals.

    Those staggering numbers are predicted to increase as time goes. Peace is a loud call now. The Sudanese authorities need to devise a stable peace plan to end the untold miseries their actions are causing on non-violent civilians. Children are compelled to deal with no school and trauma. 

    This link has more refugee rights related articles.